this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
1082 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59657 readers
2745 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eee@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah it's really strange. I'm not a fan of MS by any means, but I've found myself making so many pro-MS comments on Lemmy just because the userbase leans so heavily pro-Linux and anti-MS.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy and other Fediverse sites tend to attract folks who prefer FOSS. Early Reddit was that way too!

[–] DarienGS@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not just preferring FOSS, though – it's as if people have to publicly perform their hatred of Microsoft.

[–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

thats what anger does usually

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Pillorying Microsoft has been a FOSS tradition for decades

[–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It shouldn’t be that strange. Linux nerds are a huge Lemmy demographic.

Much more up on new technology, FOSS, and privacy issues etc. than the general population. Good fit for Lemmy.

[–] visak@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then getting downvoted by people who just disagree with your opinion. I'm one of the Reddit refugees so I don't know if we brought that with us or Lemmy was like that before but it's sad to see.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's why downvote buttons exist? If you want to express your opinion on the internet, go ahead, but you should be prepared for the possibility that it might not be a popular opinion.

[–] visak@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's just that it's boring. I'd rather have an interesting debate. Downvoting everything you simply disagree with just leads to groupthink forums.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Those downvotes aren't stopping you from having a discussion. They're just hurting your pride.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Downvote buttons are meant to be used for comments that don't contribute to the discussion or are plainly completely wrong, not for opinions you disagree with. But most people can't stand being disagreed with on things they feel passionately about, so they will still downvote where they merely disagree.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

You might need to brush up on the difference between theory and practice.

[–] funchords@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s why downvote buttons exist?

No (and not downvoted) ... it's about controlling visibility.

https://join-lemmy.org/docs/users/03-votes-and-ranking.html

My take: Upvote the stuff other people should see. Downvote the stuff that should have never been here at all. You don't have to agree or disagree, you can even have no opinion. But if you find it worthwhile to others, upvote it. Detrimental, downvote it.

[–] visak@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe there should be four buttons:

  • Upvote-good comment
  • Upvote-agree
  • Downvote-disagree
  • Downvote-unhelpful/rude

Which could be used for more filtering options.

Or maybe a separate agreement/disagree metric. I wouldn't mind seeing the consensus on a topic separate from the measure of usefulness.