69
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
69 points (87.9% liked)
Opensource
6626 readers
232 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If you build a bridge and make it open to the public, then you absolutely have both an ethical and legal obligation to make it safe to use.
That would be at least negligent manslaughter in most, if not all jurstictions.
To be clear I'm not saying that anyone has to do everything that that people request of them. But rather that there is a non-zero amount of responsibility to the public when a project is being actively maintained. If you don't want that responsibility, then let someone else take over, or announce that the project is abandoned.
The license people agree to, to use the software disclaim warranty and limited liability. So your analogy would be better if the bridge had signage explaining such that most people don't read. So not a legal obligation, but maybe it hasn't been tested in court yet.
Where I live if you build a bridge that is assessable to the public and someone gets hurt using it, because you made it unsafe to use, then you are legally responsible for that. It does not matter how many signs you put up, or what agreements were made, if you build a bridge (or other structure ) you are responsible for ensuring that it is safe to use.
Also, to clarify, it's not my analogy. I was using the one made by the person I responded to.