this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
594 points (69.4% liked)

Memes

45725 readers
757 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
594
Defediverse (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by w00t@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 

EDIT: no, I don't sympathize with nazis (neither I sympathize with those who call everyone nazi when they're losing an argument ;)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That is a pretty ironic comment because that is not what the paradox of tolerance is at all. The paradox of tolerance is that intolerance needs to be suppressed for tolerance to exist, since tolerance can't exist alongside intolerance.

The paradox is that tolerance needs to be intolerant towards intolerance in order for a tolerant society to exist, literally the exact opposite of what you wrote.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

actually both definitions are right. hence the name, paradox.

[–] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

paradox does not mean 'has two definitions'. It means the ONE definition contains a contraction, i.e. 'tolerance needs to be intolerant towards intolerance in order for a tolerant society to exist' contains a contradiction.

Really can't agree that qyron is right, doesn't seem to know what the paradox of tolerance is