113
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz

I think as a foreigner it is a little easy to miss how significant this is. The timeline of the war bleeds together and people who don't live in Ukraine can easily forget that Crimea was taken a long time ago... all the way back in 2014.

Ukrainian military commanders being able to say this confidently isn't just a sign that the meager territorial gains russia has obtained since the start of the 3 Day Special Military Operation might all vanish in what seems like a snap of a finger compared to the lives and time it took for russia to gain them.... it is a sign that Ukraine is uprooting the entire apparatus of russian power in the region that has had more than a decade to gain a foothold.

It is important to understand that for the average russian Crimea is far more relevant than basically any other territory taken from Ukraine from what I understand, it is a tourist destination spot that is also useful for its coastline and maritime access it provides, the fact that Ukraine can credibly say it will in the near future cut off Crimea is one of immense historical significance. It means this is the beginning of the end for russia, an end that might not actually be that long if russia doesn't come to the table with a realistic peace offer soon. Once air defenses systematically collapse there is no way to sustain a war machine capable of a large general offensive....

In the realm of "hearts and minds" russia losing Crimea after it had posessed it for over a decade from a conflict russia chose to begin is a major blow to the war effort and its general cultural support even if people are unable to discuss it too publicly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Scubyw@mastodon.nz 4 points 2 months ago

@supersquirrel https://sopuli.xyz/post/47108254
The only good way to go. The bridge must come down. Mine any passage under it so no exports from the Azov sea anymore. No supply across the bridge. Then focus on any shipping still 'landing' in Crimea.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There is military wisdom to keeping some bridges of retreat open however, leaving the enemy a route to flee can be the knife in the heart of their will to fight to the last man. I can't really judge that calculus not knowing all the details of whether it is a good idea to completely take the bridge down or not.

To me it seems wisest though for Ukraine to set the explosives and leave russians an impossible choice when the time comes over whether to use a bridge that appears to so far have been impervious to Ukrainian attack or at least Ukraine has been unwilling to attack, or whether to try a much more difficult route of evacuation.

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

One of the more interesting things that came out recently is that the Kerch Bridge may have been damaged severely enough to limit traffic on it. So lighter civilian traffic is good to cross it, but moving heavy equipment (like tanks, fuel, etc) is not possible.

If this is true they can leave it alone and focus on the last remaining ferry for trucks and wrecking havoc on the northern land route.

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
113 points (98.3% liked)

Ukraine

12711 readers
401 users here now

News related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

🇺🇦 Sympathy for invaders is prohibited.

🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷[Combat] videos containing footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

No AI slop

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

💳 Defense Aid 💥


💳 Humanitarian Aid ⚕️⛑️


🪖 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS