this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
384 points (98.7% liked)
Progressive Politics
4881 readers
710 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's a wild take. Profit isn't the issue. Exorbitant profit is. Who gets the profit and how its used is. When workers are the state and own the means of production, profits can be planned and used to keep production lines running, decrease hours while increasing wages, paying more taxes for basic human rights such as clean food, air, water, quality housing, quality healthcare, quality education, reduction of waste and emissions, r&d of better ways to produce, better medicine, and more!
Profit is entirely the issue, profit is undue costs on goods and services above production requirements.
Profit is exploitation commodified.
With that line of thinking, no one would get a raise or improved quality of life. This is not a binary issue, unless you are talking about socialist production vs capitalism/fascism.
Which is why ditching a capitalist system is also required. One should not have personal profits, one should have basic needs met.
Every dollar of profit is taken from the back of a worker further down the line.
Here you go: >When workers are the state and own the means of production, profits can be planned and used to keep production lines running, decrease hours while increasing wages, paying more taxes for basic human rights such as clean food, air, water, quality housing, quality healthcare, quality education, reduction of waste and emissions, r&d of better ways to produce, better medicine, and more!
Bolding added, here
State capitalism is still capitalism. It still works on the exploitation of those down the line at some degree, profit is not generated from thin air, it is taken from others earning less than their fair share or paying more than something is worth.
There is no ethical capitalism, be that private or state (states are also not the people) owned.
https://lemmygrad.ml/post/11887529
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/the-anarchist-faq-editorial-collective-an-anarchist-faq-full
I've already told you, I began with anarchism and moved to communism. I'm not saying it's entirely impossible, either, and I'm not entirely opposed to anarchy, rather that we need a practical, disciplined, and proven means to achieve it, if it's ever to be realized in materiality. It doesn't mean I like practicalities, rather that I recognize them as necessary.
I don’t even know if we’ve ever spoken before to be honest.
However I started with communism and moved to anarchism. I do not think there is any universal one size fits all approach, rather that we need many local ways of doing that accommodate the needs of the local population. That can only be achieved through empowering people at the local level and ensuring they have the flexibility to adapt and change as situations arise.
Top down models are incapable of meeting that, and routinely fall into power traps from small groups of elites from everything I see practiced historically and currently.
You have, and Maeve was insulting you for being an anarchist.
Muh left unity tho
We have! Sorry, it's one of my divergences. I think by listening to each other, we can grow our perspectives, if not evolve them.
Eta:
Believe it or not, this is a shared, popular perspective, on grad!
It's not state capitalism. If you're interested in an understanding that differs from your preferred narrative, they are abundant on grad. If you can stomach it.
Did... you actually read the comment to which you originally replied?
If “socialist” production has profit, it is capitalistic.
Like what was already said, life would be a lot more boring. But at least we'd be free of the hamster wheel.
And yeah, no, you wouldn't get a raise, because there'd be no money. You can't get a raise if you can't make a profit, very correct.
Look, imagine these initial conditions: start with 100 people in a moneyless society. Give each person 100 coins. Now ask everyone to make a profit.
That means creating money out of thin air.
The system is b-r-o-k-e-n.
The current Western system is working as designed. Do you imagine a fantastical leap forward without any sort of transitioning steps from here to there? I'm working hard to understand you.
I know it's working as designed — working against us.
I'm not imagining a leap forward, I'm imagining a leap backwards, to freedom before there was money. Sorry if this has been unclear all along...
~~Would you be so kind as to elucidate in some detail?~~
I didn't realize who you were until I scrolled up. Barter is cumbersome and greatly limits mobility. Do you propose means to overcome that?
I do not. Like I said, again, life will be a lot more boring and cumbersome. Trade-off.
What fucking bullshit.
Profit is a goddamn lie. It's MY FUCKING LABOR, anything bit returned to me and the crew after operating costs are covered is stolen wages.
Profit IS rent seeking, and requires that actual progress of the community be violently suppressed. People with an honest desire to help the community are forced to accept exploitative conditions that enable this theft, otherwise you starve and die.
Nothing good has ever, or will ever, come from the system you describe, since it CAUSES every god damn problem that it supposedly fixes. resulting in a vicious cycle of pain and more pain and nothing else.
It seemed to work in AES states well enough.
Not wild at all. It isn't even a "take", just basic facts and logic. Everyone cannot make a profit. That's just not possible.
Your scenario of workers owning the means of production and all that, they'd still be participating in the grand world scheme of paying for things with money. It doesn't make a difference.
What sort of circumlocution is this? You are arguing against nothing I said.
I'm saying everything you said is irrelevant to the point I'm making. Sorry if that was unclear.