this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
323 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

59657 readers
2710 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sdf05@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is like that show "Upload"; the guy literally gets killed by a car

[–] III@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should finish watching that first episode before making such bold statements.

[–] Ocelot@lemmies.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean I think its still a valid point. The car in the show was sabotaged, and that is definitely something that might be a thing once all cars self-drive. Especially once they remove controls like steering wheels.

There hasn't been a tesla FSD hack yet, but it would take spoofing a software update (and spoof the authentication and certs, etc)... The attacker would need to have access to a pretty massive supercomputer to make their own custom self-driving software and today getting the certs and everything right is next to impossible... but even then its only next to impossible, not impossible.

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It may be difficult to spoof a certificate today, but tomorrow is a whole new day. To wit, OpenSSL has a pretty long history of serious vulnerabilities, despite being the best SSL library out there.

It is absolutely only a matter of time until the Tesla OTA functionality is compromised. There's too many moving parts for it to not be.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

"Attack surface" is the term you want. Big software means big attack surface. So keep code lean for security as well as efficiency.

[–] Ocelot@lemmies.world 0 points 1 year ago

There are still a lot of other layers that need to be compromised past the cert for such an attack to even be possible. Even so, I suspect when such an attack does happen it will probably be for stealing cars. Your car would just wake up in the middle of the night and drive itself somewhere else to be cut up for parts. Less likely is any kind of safety issue since its so easy to take over control of the car.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That was a really good show.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well hold on there, he survived the crash, and would probably have been ok. It was the upload that killed him.

[–] sdf05@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, my bad 🤣 I meant the car technically endangered him to not live longer 😔