this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
-7 points (31.6% liked)

Asklemmy

55075 readers
385 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Who should get the largest share of criticism society or individuals?

Please be civil in the comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] sblxck@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree on the conditioning aspect but is there not some biological imperative as well? Generally attractive traits deemed desirable from an evolutionary perspective

What we view as attractive is socially constructed and varies over time and place. See e.g. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0738081X23000251

Youth and health are probably a proxy for fertility, so that would be related to physical attraction, but why should that affect how we treat people? That's not a reason to favor the young or to disfavor the old. Not only that, but community care of children meant everyone had a role in the greater sense of "fertility".