60
submitted 3 months ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 4 points 3 months ago

Do they need to do any updates? The point of it was the message, it was never about making a serious OS. It was literally just "we're going to break California law because there isn't shit a single state in the US can do about it".

Also, I thought I read that open source projects were recently exempted, so the point is probably moot now anyway.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago

It was obviously performative at the time. A lot of bitching and moaning but in the end, it was a nothingburger change that distros could ignore as they do every other field on the user profile in systemD. But they had to make a "distro" to show how serious they were, then ignore it completely.

I said at the time if it were maintained in 90 days I'd eat a bug. Apparently I was off by about 75 days.

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
60 points (74.6% liked)

Linux

15035 readers
242 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS