this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Ask

1621 readers
16 users here now

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Posts must be legitimate questions (no rage bait or sea lioning)
  3. No spam
  4. NSFW allowed if tagged
  5. No politics
  6. For support questions, please go to !newcomers@piefed.zip

Icon by Hilmy Abiyyu A.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
BoozeOrWater@piefed.social
cloudless@piefed.social
fxomt@piefed.social
1
Where there people in the 1980's who refused to call 3.5" floppy disks floppy disks? (cake.kobel.fyi)
submitted 1 month ago by squirrel@cake.kobel.fyi to c/ask@piefed.social
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Compared to 5.25" and 8" floppy disks, the 3.5" weren't very floppy. They didn't bend that easily, were stiff compared to the older formats.

Paragraph from Wikipedia:

Generally, the term floppy disk persisted, even though later style floppy disks have a rigid case around an internal floppy disk.

Where there people who refused to call 3.5" floppy disks floppy disks because they weren't floppy enough?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They were also square. We still called them "discs".

[–] teft@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The disc inside is still round though. Did you never crack one open to see?

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Of course I did. OP is asking if our description matched the inside or the outside, I'm giving further evidence that the (rigid, square) casing didn't affect that description.