this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
179 points (99.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9383 readers
405 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I agree except we can reeducate the young children. I like how you go from that right back to tax the rich first 😂😅 they’ll get what’s coming. No kids tho

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Agreed. Those people do not care about theit kids anyways.

[–] deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Ya those kids need to be saved and protected not killed. That guy is way wrong for that. The rest of the message wasn’t that bad tho

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No you have to eliminate their legacy. They can keep their lives and loved ones, OR their money but not both.

[–] deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nah kids can be reeducated. This ain’t tsarist Russia buddy Have some sanctity. Adults are fair but saying kids does make u seem like a fed

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I agree that you need to destroy their legacy but disagree that that's what it takes to do it. The revolutionaries in China took the last emperor and made him a gardener. I understand that things happen in these situations and sometimes the quick solution is chosen, but overall I think it's better to eliminate their power by scattering their wealth and converting their children.