Typewriters

262 readers

1 users here now

A community dedicated to everything related to manual, electric and electronic typewriters, their history, use, collection, service, maintenance, …

Things published with a typewriter but about something else should be published in !typecasts@sh.itjust.works

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

purposetypist@lemmy.cafe

zloubida@sh.itjust.works

The Christian Science Monitor ponders the analog resurgence of typewriters | Paper Blogging (www.paperblogging.com)

submitted 1 month ago by zloubida@sh.itjust.works to c/typewriters@lemmy.cafe

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Libb@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In a world overwhelmed by cellphones, laptops, and other screens, there is a growing space for the old school and analog – from landline phones to Walkmans and typewriters.

After reading the CSM article (link to the actual article), I was reminded of a simple question I don’t think I've ever asked around here: why do we use a typewriter?

I mean, beside its visual/collectible appeal why do we decide to use a typewriter and not just, say, a pen and paper instead?

They’re both ‘old school’ and ‘analog’ (I would say low-tech, and a great way to ‘resist’ that high-tech society), they’re both screen-less, they’re also both 100% offline (distraction-free, focused, update/upgrade-free), and they’re both privacy-respecting too. The pen is also a lot more portable, easier to travel and can be much cheaper too.

You’re not distracted by the machine itself.

Isn’t that at least as true with the humble pen(cil) ?

I do use typewriters, an Olympia SG1 + a much quieter (and much more portable ;) Canon TypeStar 220, but for most of my writing I use pen and paper—fountain pen and/or pencil—as most of my writing is done longhand.

But typewriters, they also say, are just noisily enjoyable.

I’m afraid oftentimes this will only be true for the person using it, not the people around. My spouse made it clear she would like for me to find a much quieter device for when I went to use a typewriter: in our small flat, it was really a noisy device (even to our neighbors). Hence, me getting my hands on the Canon TypeStar.

So, to get back to my original question: I know why I use a typewriter (when I will start working on a second draft, as I already have everything set up into place more or less firmly) but I was wondering about your motivations?

Or could it be because the younger generations never learned writing longhand, cursive, and do indeed need a keyboard?

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

For me, the reason is easy: my writing is horrible. I learnt cursive at school (and my children are learning only cursive at school, cursive is not disappearing in France at all) so it's not the problem. I'm creative, but clumsy, so the typewriter is the perfect solution for me. Moreover, I have ADHD, so I need things to “launch” me if I want to do something. Often the typewriter do the trick. And there's a pleasure in the act of typing that i don't feel with a computer or a pen.

But maybe it could be a self standing post instead of a comment? You'd have more answers.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

For me, the reason is easy: my writing is horrible.

Fear not, mine is as well (and I used to be a paid creative too, now I'm just creative because that's what I am) ;)

But maybe it could be a self standing post instead of a comment? You’d have more answers.

Maybe, I just always think we're such a tiny bunch most of us must be reading whatever is happening, even in a comment ;)