this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
946 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19002 readers
3913 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A gay doctor who is one of Louisiana’s only specialist paediatric cardiologists has left the state after the introduction of a Don’t Say Gay copycat bill and a ban on gender-affirming care for trans youth.

Jake Kleinmahon, who was one of just three doctors specialising in heart transplants for children in Louisiana, chose to leave the state with his family, as they no longer felt safe.

Kleinmahon met and fell in love with his husband Tom in New Orleans, and the couple expected remain in Louisiana, even after retirement. However, he told CNN that the state’s anti-LGBTQ+ legislation made him and his family feel unwelcome and that he ultimately “didn’t have a choice”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The lawmakers don't care, they can go where they need for care. But many non R voters will leave cementing R control of the state for years to come -- it's a genius plan really.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It is a major part of the GOP strategy.

Senator Josh Hawley from Missouri has openly acknowledged that the GOP strategy is to make it so miserable for Democrats in red and purple states that they will move to blue states. That would, in turn, cement Republican power in the White House, Senate and thereby the Supreme Court.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well that’s fucking horrifying & anti-democratic.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Yup. Polarizing politics benefits Republicans since the electoral system favors low-population states.

If all Democrats congregate in a few large states and Republicans spread out, Democrats will never see electoral power at the federal level again.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't see how this won't inevitably lead to a civil war. Maybe not this decade, but the seeds are being set.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This time, let's not stop until we get to the coasts.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It will have to be either that or Balkanizaton. Red states need blue states for their federal handouts, but not the other way around.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Oh wow, I didn't know it had been made so explicit.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't it have the opposite effect? The majority of states which are doing this are deep red states, and someone who flees is unlikely to move into another one. There aren't a lot of swing states though where Republicans can enact this sort of legislation. Arizona's got a Dem governor for instance, and Wisconsin a Dem supreme court. The only places they're going to be able to unleash their horrible agenda are places where they have governorship, legislature, and supreme court, and that isn't typically the case in swing states.

I think the net effect actually fucks Republicans. They don't need more voters in red states, they need more voters in swing states. And they're going to be sending some pissed off Democrats to those states. Margins are tight in swing states, and currently the GOP voter base is dying of old age while more young people turn 18 each day.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I really hope I'm not.