395
I have a problem but not sure how to fix it
(lemmy.nz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
395 points (99.5% liked)
Bikini Bottom Twitter
4877 readers
1 users here now
Ahoy, me buckos! Welcome to Bikini Bottom Twitter! Your digital reef for the latest salty gossip and treasure tales! And while you're at it, be sure to drop by the Krusty Krab for a delicious Krabby Patty so I can get yer mon- err I mean, 'cause they're the best treat under the sea!
Rule 1 - This is Bikini Bottom Twitter, all posts should be Spongebob related in "(Old-School) Twitter-like" form
Rule 2 - Political posts, as long as it follows rule 1, will be permitted, so long as you behave yourselves.
Bikini Bottom Municipal Code §33-07: Anti-Tankie Ordinance Residents are prohibited from circulating tankie ideology or other authoritarian propaganda on Bikini Bottom Twitter. Offenders will be permanently banned from BPT by the BBPD faster than Plankton is ejected from The Krusty Krab.
Rule 3 - Please no reposts within the last couple days, at least
Rule 4 - All posts should be at least above a "Squirdward-krusty-krab-shift" level of effort
Rule 5 - Be chill, be a Patrick not a squidward.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
With AI, this assumption is proving false day by day. Critical resources have been let go by my employer in the hope of matching their contributions with junior/fresh engineers + AI. I have heard similar stories from friends too.
However, I am yet to hear a real life instance of a company walking back and rehiring - something that I keep reading in news.
www.fox2detroit.com/news/ford-ai-engineering-challenges-rehiring.amp (Sorry for fox link, the other one I have is paywalled)
I personally know people affected by this, they were let got and last week they got offers to fix a bunch of stuff that AI did and didn't do
Thanks. This is one of the news articles I had in mind while writing my original comment.
That was a real life instance.
Survivorship bias i suspect, the company needs to fuck up big enough for it to be worth noting, survive that fuck-up and then admit enough wrongdoing (fiscally, if nothing else) to be able to be in the situation where a story like that would come out.
I think we'll hear more over time, but as a thing that happened in the past.
Some companies might not survive to rehire, some might only just survive and rehiring isn't on the cards.
Some might limp forwards and work through without rehires.
Is your employer by chance hiring for junior/fresh engineers who won't use AI, or is using AI one of the job requirements?
No. They actually have an interview round where the candidate is given access to a coding agent and a problem to solve.
this is hilarious
this whole practice is going to age like shit
watching companies fail because they thought ai would work is lol
no industry with half a brain thinks ai is going to replace their top workers
as to having an example of real life regret look up ford
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgrkd41n2v9o
Interesting. We laid off all of our junior engineers, and only kept senior people who are now expected to use AI for junior engineer tasks, then review it all and fix it all. Would be easier for me to just write it all myself rather than babysit some AI and argue with it when it fucks up.
I do not envy the people who will have to maintain that giant ball of vibe-coded shit, assuming the company still exists in the future after that mess inevitably blows up spectacularly.