An Anarchist FAQ Reading Group - Section C.2 - Week #14, Week #15, Week #16, Week #17 (lemmy.nz)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz to c/anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey y'all! Here we are reading and discussing Section C.2 of AFAQ the following 4(!) weeks! I will update the title each week and I will re-ping you here each week.

Happy reading!

Section C.2: https://anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionC.html#secc2

There is also an EPUB version of AFAQ, courtesy of @irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com: here

If you'd like to join, please comment and we'll ping you next post.

Link to last week's read: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/55777470

PS. Feedback request: How did you find last week's reading pace? Fast/Slow/OK/etc.?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Can anyone explain me the Cambridge Capital Controversy in ~3-4 sentences? I even read the wikipedia page and couldn't find a proper explanation for me. There is this part in afaq which I find it confusing and maybe contradictory, C.2.5:

This means that a "change in the capital input will change output, but it also changes the wage, and the rate of profit . . . As a result, the distribution of income is neither meritocratic nor determined by the market. The distribution of income is to some significant degree determined independently of marginal productivity and the impartial blades of supply and demand

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025

19 points (100.0% liked)

Anarchism

3321 readers

24 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.

Other anarchist comms

Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

Banner by @Val@anarchist.nexus

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com