368
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 74 points 2 months ago

Apparently it's not as risk-free as they thought.

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social -2 points 2 months ago

Against the billions they have made churning these out? Yeah, it is.

[-] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I mean yes on average but potentially no on the trend. The whole point is to de-risk their bullshit, if they view this as a trend instead of an isolated incident other projects might be more likely to get greenlit instead of recycled stories. Pretty much any soulless cash grab bombing incentivizes making actual art.

[-] blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If they were looking at things collectively this way, they wouldn't be making so many remakes and would be making more original movies.

This movie is the result of the risk analysis of each project, not the risk over a time period with multiple projects.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
368 points (98.9% liked)

movies

3893 readers
240 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS