Formula 1

9086 readers

140 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series

Rules

Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
No gambling, crypto or NFTs
Spoilers are allowed
Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

submitted 1 year ago by alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to c/formula1@lemmy.world

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] The_one_and_only@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Mate, let it go. Ultimately is was 400k I believe?

The decreased wind tunnel-time and CFD-time do have an impact, so I can't imagine any advantage from that 400k to still be lasting.

[–] Tagger@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The 400k is a lie. It was over a million. The 400k figure was if they had applied for a tax break they didn't apply for and had been granted it.

[–] The_one_and_only@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

If you are correcting figures one way, you have to correct them both ways. That is how financial auditors always work.