this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
23 points (79.5% liked)
Asklemmy
55061 readers
253 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You mapped out two scenarios and in neither scenario did anyone lie to you.
In scenario one I don’t see how the employees of the software company are lying to you. They aren’t the ones who decided to switch the software, your bosses are. Why the bosses made that decision your post did not say. How do you know that your bosses were well aware that they purchased a “beta” version?
In scenario two the primary issue is your assumption. You assumed that this lawyer would be available when you were not working. I don’t know your shift but if that is “9-5” then I am confused by your angst. I have hired a number of lawyers all of them work in the 9-5 time frames. You did not clarify your assumption therefore the lawyer has not lied to you.
Yeah. It is possible that, in Scenario 1, the bosses were just incompetent. It is possible that either no one in the room knew the problems OP is having or they were people low in seniority who were afraid to speak up.
Sure.. but no one is lying to him.
I agree.