this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
254 points (97.0% liked)

politics

30618 readers
1730 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Friday’s appeals court ruling in the New Jersey case goes further than a July 2024 ruling from a federal judge, who said that the state’s ban on AR-15s specifically was unconstitutional but upheld the provision barring larger magazines.

The third US circuit court of appeals said on Friday in its opinion that the state’s ban on all semiautomatic rifles it deems to be “assault firearms” and its restriction on “large capacity ammunition magazines” were unconstitutional.

New Jersey’s attorney general, Jennifer Davenport, a Democrat whose office defended the law, told the Associated Press that the decision is “as unfortunate as it is legally incorrect”.

"Gotta maximize the body count of school children"

-These judges, probably

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Damn

The legality of something doesn't make it effective.

So

We should make Y illegal and that'll be effective.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You're gonna cry about having to register a firearm too, so why stop there. Just ban it, then compromise on registration at minimum.

I own a handgun, I'm not against them. I am against how easy it is to get them. I bought one at a metro stop for cash, no paperwork, 100% legal in my state.

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

I'm just pointing out that your logic is that making one thing illegal doesn't work yet you turn around and say making something else illegal will be.

Just like making the mod, making any (all) the parts isn't all that complex... The most successful guns are simple (and plentiful in whole and parts).

I'm not crying about anything... And it's basically a free for all here.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Nope, only from a retailer at the time. Private sales required nothing.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Its easier to modify an existing tool to become illegal than it is to completely make the illegal thing from scratch, at least on a large scale.

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Marginally.. what you're saying is it's easier to swap out a (few) parts than it is to assemble all/most parts. The nuts, in the context of this posts subject, I've talked to are bringing the "most" to the few parts as is. The ones bring the whole to the mods are usually the pistol crowd.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Either way, the school shooters, like Nikolas Cruz, aren't the most dedicated gun enthusiasts. Most mass shooters just get a tool of mass execution. They usually aren't the ones who will take the time to modify firearms into full auto unless its easy to do (i.e., bump stocks).

The mentality of psychopaths is to inflict as much harm as quickly and easily as possible. Limiting the scope of their access to the tools of mass death is good. Maybe they only get 6 shots off in one load instead of thirty. Maybe the reload time to get those 6 shots off is 15 seconds instead of 7. Its small, but maybe those few seconds lets a daughter get home to her mom that night.

Look, psychopaths are going to psychopath. But, there's a second amendment. What can a gun enthusiast do with an AR15 that they can't do with a CVA? Fight off the fascists? They have drones and tomahawks.