News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Isn't the whole point of that website to have manipulatable outcomes so the potential whistleblower is financially motivated to expose his knowledge by placing a bet?
No the point of the website is to use insider knowledge to scam rubes, while the website takes its cut.
Potayto Patahto.
Why is it different than betting on something at a regular bookmaker's where someone could, hypothetically, be betting with insider knowledge?
Generally, legal gambling has lots of protections and controls in place to at least theoretically limit manipulation of the odds.
It's also probably very bad for humans to gamble on things like wildfires or war crimes.
Do you mean "legal betting"? AFAIK poly market is legal most places.
I believe in my country there is no specific regulation of inside information used in sports versus other betting.
For example, using insider knowledge to manipulate stock markets will lead to the government taking away your earnings and sending you to prison.
An athlete using their position on the team to change the outcome of a game in order to win bets is generally met with ejection from the team and league, and there may be financial and legal penalties as well.
Casinos generally have detailed regulations to ensure that their games are fair representations of what is presented.
I'm not sure what country you're in, but you should probably take a closer look at the legal codes around sports betting.
Polymarket itself faces different levels of prohibition in many countries around the world.
I looked them up before writing my comment. They cover both legal and non-legal frameworks (i.e. being fired, not just being prosecuted) and all areas. They focus most on sports but use examples from other areas of life.
yes
No, its so that insiders can make a bunch of money by scamming idiots while the website owners take a cut
It came out that the guy that ran Trump's teleprompter made bank on one of these apps. So yeah, it's just insider trading with a different name.
https://www.npr.org/2026/07/16/nx-s1-5896223/kalshi-trump-white-house-teleprompter-operator-bet
Guess he didn't pay the big man and now he's getting investigated.