820
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
820 points (96.6% liked)
Technology
88537 readers
4013 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
The Örebro Party leader is a communist. So not quite far right. And they don't even have a party program right now. They are still working on it for the 2026 election.
Well, that's what the leader says.
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markus_Allard
"Han har istället beskrivit sin ideologiska hemvist som populism och nationalism på marxistisk grund"
Populism + nationalism based on marxism.
Why do you even bother when you don't know anything about the party? The leader was kicked out of the youth part of the most leftist party in the parliament in 2014. And he was kicked out for being too extreme left (he had supported the Revolutionary Front). And he started a pod with a guy who had also been kicked out for the same reason.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Front_(Sweden)
Well. Its well known they have some left options and a lot of far right opinions. Doesn't matter if he once identified as a extreme leftist. He is now supporting way more far right opinions. It's just facts. Do as you want with the facts.
What’s your argument here exactly? That having once held left wing views means all future positions can’t possibly be right wing despite all evidence to the contrary?
There was once this guy Mussolini who was a fervent communist iirc...
Seem to recall he got a bit rightish in later life
He himself claims that you can't really place their politics on the scale, because he picks ideas from both sides. Yeah, their politics are messy, but they have very fascist and white-supremacist overtones, and they gladly work with nazis. So I don't personally care for trivial bickering about definitions here.
Dude basically read Ayn Rand and thought "whoa yeah, that's the shit", when in actuality it's just shit.
Honestly, it's like when right-wingers want everything privatised and scream that taxation is theft, but they're totally happy with having taxes pay for their stuff. Just because they like to benefit from socialist policies doesn't mean that they're socialists.
that's what i thought, then i read what they actually want from an interview allard did in 2022. he's basically invented a new class he calls the "transferiat", which he claims is the main leech on society. the members of this class? public servants, journalists, and people on social security (allard even specifies "immigrants" there). he wants to get rid of this class, in order to achieve smaller government, "higher quality" reporting, and fewer welfare queens.
that's a textbook right-conservative agenda.