this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
162 points (97.6% liked)
Technology
86706 readers
3659 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
One episode of How Money Works (this one, I think) talks about how the AI and tech companies would simultaneously insist that Chinese AI was a national security problem (and therefore we should deregulate AI research) while simultaneously arguing they should be allowed to sell their chips to China.
That was before Chinese models made some serious gains and is catching up to the capability of Anthropic.
So the AI sector here in the States has been duplicitous about its status.
Also in recent news (like here), OpenAI is seeking to borrow $1.5 trillion while only expecting to make $20 billion in profits.
Also prices have risen on AI tokens, to the point they exceed the salaries of the workers AI was allegedly going to replace.
I think the US AI sector promised too much and has been trying to catch up by feeding more and more resources to the development process. I remember some sci-fi stories / hypotheticals about self-replicating AI being asked a super-difficult question and in an effort to get smart enough to answer it, the AI system ate the earth. We're doing exactly that, except with humans involved, who can't seem to help themselves.
Their messaging is wildly inconsistent. They try different talking points and see what sticks.
It's the same with "AI will take people's jobs" line repeated to investors and CEOs, and later disavowed when speaking to a general public more and more hostile to AI companies