this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
211 points (96.9% liked)

Fediverse

43154 readers
1074 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/72685299

I discovered this after upgrading our instance yesterday, which also upgraded all frontends to their latest versions as well. After I did, our Tesseract frontend stopped working and I noticed immediately as it's been my primary for a while. Initially I thought it was an API version mismatch, but no, it was much worse.

Someone pointed out that the developer of the frontend added an explicit hidden and unmodifiably blacklist which includes any and all instances to the left of Kissinger. There's a commit which also explains their specious reasoning about our instance specifically, as it seems we've been on their shit list for a bit longer than that.

This instance and its admin staff encourages identity politics, groupthink, mob mentality, and extremist solutions to societal problems. Users who advocate violence are not moderated so long as the admins agree with the target. Caution and critical thinking are advised when interacting with this instance or its users.

When you use tesseract to connect to one blacklisted such instance , you just get a message informing you that Tesseract is "incompatible with that instance" which leads one to think of a technical issue, like an API mismatch, rather than the dev being an opinionated coward.

Isn't it funny how all the software developed by turbolibs, like Piefed and Tesseract, end up with hidden control mechanisms from developers who think they know better than everyone else? That they don't just think they deserve to tell you what you should think, but they should manipulate you to think it? Isn't it funny how libs go on about how bad it is to support lemmy due to the ideology of the devs behind it, and yet lemmy has 0 opinions as a software? It does make one think...

Anyway, I forked - it as one does - and disabled the blacklist, but since this is a massively ideologically compromised software, I'll doubt I'll keep this frontend up after Lemmy 1.0. I think we'll bring up mlmym again now that someone's maintaining it again.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You're equating Lemmy's now disabled slur-filter to a hard-coded censor list of queer and leftist instances and users. Are you aware of how that comes across?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They don't care because that's all they got to deflect from any obvious issues and attack those they hate

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's like they have a canned response where they added stuff at the end to try focus anything towards ml because of the slur filter when people question piefed or others they like.

Example

https://lemmy.world/comment/24492014

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Seems excessively strange to have such a strong reaction towards a now-defunct slur filter.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oh this would explain it. https://lemmy.world/comment/24877103

Now wondering if it's another dev or pr person for piefed.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

Big time shill.