this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
58 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8858 readers
259 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
58
Food price fears after Europe’s heatwave destroys estimated €2bn of crops (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 6 days ago by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/climate@slrpnk.net
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 days ago

So unless fertiliser results in more than 30x yield, the cow is worse than eating the food directly.

Only thing is if its grass fed then its food humans can't eat. But grain or soy fed cattle? We could eat that! And I can't imagine many people are using fertiliser to grow grass. Well, except people into lawns.