16
Émile Torres deep-sneers Nick Bostrom, the smartest man in Sweden
(www.realtimetechpocalypse.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
16 points (100.0% liked)
SneerClub
1305 readers
16 users here now
Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.
AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)
This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.
[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]
See our twin at Reddit
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
My first reaction was that many thinkers and academics synthesize ideas from older sources and that this doesn't sound that bad (well except for some of the ideas being eugenics or AI doomerism)... some of the examples Emile points out look like just straight up plagiarism.
I agree that being a self-aggrandizing dick is probably on the lower end of the harms Bostrom has inflicted upon the world, but I think it's worth calling out, especially because it runs counter to the narrative that the people who are working to advance the bigger harms use to advance their agenda.
Also, Bostrom is an academic writing for serious publications. The standards are higher than when Yudkowsky was rewriting pop-science books without sufficient attribution on his private blog, because Yudkowsky is a self-published autodidact.
Yeah, definitely. Even if you are heavily modifying an idea or synthesizing multiple ideas, not citing your sources is still major academic misconduct.
its not plagiarism, its listserv to journal intellectual arbitrage, totally rational thing to do. /s