this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
158 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck AI

7758 readers
869 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I decided to lookup some history of my local area, and i was reading a whole page until i noticed some things didnt add up. It was stating some obscure things such as it (the local place) has it's own currency and whatnot.

I decided to check the sources they used, and i noticed it was some stupid wiki page made by Grok.

Sure i can't fact chek all of it, small point's were correct but for crying out loud. Please.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skyline969@piefed.ca 57 points 4 days ago (7 children)

DuckDuckGo is pretty much useless now. The overwhelming majority of links it throws at me for any search are just the most obvious AI slop. This is a dark time for the internet.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 34 points 4 days ago

DuckDuckGo is pretty much useless now.

And every other search engine just skips the middleman and shoves the AI slop directly onto the search results page.

Dead internet time, baby!

[–] fistac0rpse@fedia.io 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's such a weird coincidence that the two largest companies involved in search engines, Google and Microsoft, are fully invested in AI. It almost feels like they have made their search engines useless so that people are pushed to use AI chatbots instead. Really makes you think.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago

That they’re trying to curb traffic by reducing pagination or giving bad results? I also haven’t seen as many ads, which is weird and sus af.

[–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Bougie_Birdie@piefed.blahaj.zone 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I use this URL as my default search engine too.

It's great that it disables the AI overview / summary, but I don't think it has any impact on the search results

Happy to be proven wrong

[–] soratoyuki@piefed.zip 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I don't think people, including the ones responding to you, have the causality right. It's not that searching is broken (although it is) but the actual human internet is dead. You can switch from Google to Bing to DDG to No AI DDG to Ecosia to Kaji, but they're all just pointing to different orders of the same low quality junk websites. I don't think we can optimally search our way out of the sea of slop and referral links that makes up the vast majority of the internet now.

RIP human internet (1980ish - 2020ish). We had a good run.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Except that there are publicly available court documents from a case against Google showing that in the 2010s they started intentionally reducing the quality of search results (or at bare minimum refusing to roll out fully built and tested improvements to it) in order to artificially boost impressions and click through of the paid ads on their search results. See "The Man Who Killed Google Search" by Ed Zitron on his Where's your Ed At blog.

So it's a combination. Things started going downhill with the popular search engines far earlier in attempts to boost ads and with the hyperproliferation of sketchy SEO tactics, then the whole house of cards got fucking bulldozed by AI.

But I'd also argue that the human internet is hanging on fine, it's just a massive pain in the ass to find good sources and maintain your own personal list of "go to"s.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I downloaded Wikipedia in 2020 just to have something

[–] roomy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Wait thats smart, have every wiki page archived pre LLM

[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is probably a case of blind men touching an elephant, but Kagi to me genuinely feels like Google did 15 years ago.

The actually-useful static content of the internet is still there buried under the deluge of slop.

[–] soratoyuki@piefed.zip 4 points 4 days ago

Kagi is the one big alternative I haven't tried because of the paywall, but maybe I'll finally bite the bullet.

[–] TacticalToothbrush@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Most of our search result pages feature one or more Instant Answers. To deliver Instant Answers on specific topics, DuckDuckGo leverages many sources, including specialized sources like Sportradar and crowd-sourced sites like Wikipedia. We also maintain our own crawler (DuckDuckBot) and many indexes to support our results. Of course, we have more traditional links and images in our search results too, which we largely source from Bing. Our focus is synthesizing all these sources to create a superior search experience.

Whatever they are doing over there, it's not working.

I also noticed that majority of results from DDG are some random website with no relation to my query whatsoever, having bot written article picked up by some SEO trickery. e.g garbage site about cooking (doubt) having tech related article written by bot. These sites seem to have articles for everything.

Another complain is how they detect simple unit conversion (or calculator) query. DDG have converter UI and still shove garbage converter sites up my face, I don't even know how these sites managed to have some specific "convert x unit a to y unit b" indexed. Annoying AF.

SEO is a broken game and index/crawler should change the way they do things. As it is, I see no point putting in effort to cater to good crawler anymore. Might as well block them all and go back to early 00's style neighbor links, slap tar pit and anubis on it for good measure.

I would love some suggestion for alternative privacy respecting search engine that have some "sense" of what they are actually indexing.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I also noticed that majority of results from DDG are some random website with no relation to my query whatsoever

....that's an exaggeration. I use ddg daily and it works fine most of the time for me. And when it doesn't I cannot remember ever once thinking "no relation whatsoever to my query"...

Right. I need to calm down.
Recent long research on machining messed me up good.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

Nowadays you can’t just read a random website without bumping into slop. Reading stuff online has always been risky, but nowadays you have to be extra critical.

Bad sources have always existed, so these are not radically new skills. The amount of unreliable text out there has completely exploded though, which means most of the material available to you is not worth reading.

[–] billbasher@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

startpage.com actually has good results still and no ai. used to be ixquick