Selfhosted

61054 readers

1135 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

[AIT] The Codeberg ban on LLM content (aussie.zone)

submitted 6 days ago by SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

143 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Right - I see the other topic has been locked / author hasn't returned to follow community rules.

Here's the original topic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49003386

and a measured (IMHO) response to it. (BTW, do your self a favour and change tabs with that site open :)

https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/i-regret-migrating-to-codeberg/

It's a tough spot, Codeberg has found themselves in and I wish them luck. But beyond that, this is (yet) another reminder that in 2026, if you don't self host it, the cloud is just someone else computer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

5 Zimbabwean dollars.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So then why are you asking other people to on your behalf?

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hmm, maybe the bits of my post that you didn't quote contain the answer.

First though you need to understand I'm mainly saying I don't buy their justification.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, you made a large assumption that this holds up in court completely, predicated on the idea that anything but would be disastorus.

I don't buy that premise, and neither does codeberg. So again, why should they put money up in that assumption?

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I made three claims and you talked about a single one, and not in a substantive way.

This conversation doesn't seem to be going anywhere interesting or useful, so goodbye.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And all 3 hinge on the premise of courts will do 'sane' things, without any kind of justification for them. So yeah, all 3 are moot if you remove that assumption.

So how much money should be risked on that bet?

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

Jesus Christ, I didn't think I was being subtle.