this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
400 points (97.8% liked)

Programming

27880 readers
270 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Would be a terrible shame if lots of people opted out.

If you are a EU citizen you might also want to write a complaint to privacy@huggingface.co because they are collecting your personally identifiable information in machine-readable form which they are distributing to third parties.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 162 points 4 days ago (5 children)

We want to give developers agency over their source code by letting them decide whether or not it should be used to develop and evaluate machine learning models.

fuck them seriously; if you want to do that then don't steal the repositories in the first place.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 109 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Meanwhile at work we just had a training course that specifically said doing “opt out” instead of “opt in” violates the principle of informed consent.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 33 points 4 days ago

Notice how a shit load of these people keep turning up to be rapists and pedophiles… They have no shits to give about informed consent. In their mind you don’t even have the right to the same agency they do.

not surprising since the venn diagram of ai bros and rapists is a circle.

[–] lps2@lemmy.ml 38 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Kinda hope it uses my code. It's so terrible there's no doubt it will make the resulting code from the model worse even if the impact is miniscule

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 days ago

I just opted out of all my repos except the God awful ones from middle and highschool. Those are basically prompt poison so fuckem

[–] MrLLM@ani.social 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They cloned a few projects I’ve made that rely heavily on a library I also made, I’m only pulling out the library.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 4 days ago

Modern tech companies love using the rapsist's model of consent.

[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Unless I'm mistaken, this wasn't written by the folks that scaped GitHub in the first place, someone just wrote a small tool to semi-automate the process of searching the scraped dats, and submitting a GitHub issue to have it removed.

it's pretty clear from the language of the site, the fact that it's on the hugging face domain, and the fact that the github organisation for the "opt out" makes it clear it's hugging face.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev -1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

don’t steal the repositories

How is this remotely stealing?

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's not, but it may be violation of licenses. And also, if it has personal information on it, that's probably illegal under the GDPR.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 0 points 3 days ago

but it may be violation of licenses

They excluded code with non-permissive licenses apparently:

Each file is labelled permissive (at least one permissive license detected, no conflicting non-permissive license), no_license (no licenses detected, or only non-license legal texts such as CLAs), or non_permissive. The permissive allowlist follows the Blue Oak Council list plus licenses categorized as Permissive or Public Domain by ScanCode. Files classified as non_permissive are excluded from both released datasets.

also, if it has personal information on it, that’s probably illegal under the GDPR.

It's all public so I would be extremely surprised if that were the case.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

the method on github is to fork it not steal all the data in an external storage for external purposes without consent of the user.

edit: you can also report their whole account to github here: https://support.github.com/contact/report-abuse?category=report-abuse&report=bigcode-project&report_id=110470554&report_type=user

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure they just cloned the repos. That's how GitHub is designed to work. Have you never cloned a repo from GitHub?

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but I used it under the licence terms of the original developer.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev -3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So have they. They filter by license - see my other comment.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

It doesn't seem that way. My list contains several repositories that don't have licenses, even some with GPL.

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

so if you are licenced under MIT and they use your code, they publish your copyright header?

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev -2 points 3 days ago

Yes. If they train AI from your code? No, but the legality of that is yet to be settled and definitely leaning towards "it's fine".

not for private for profit use from shitty ai companies though.....