this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
619 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

86745 readers
2481 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] soratoyuki@piefed.zip 106 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Without a warrant, it's literally his phone to do with it what he pleases. Baffled that that's not the end of the conversation.

Assuming we lived in a rational world with a fair and impartial justice system, and not one that exists to funnel money from the working class into the Epstein class and kill or imprison everyone that makes that less easy.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 32 points 4 days ago

Oh, because they are outside US borders they claim not to need a warrant, but that doesn't stop them using US law to prosecute him though.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think the supreme court has said they can search phones without warrants at the border and points of entry, so airports.

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You can't be compelled to give them your password, but you can be compelled to use your biometric ID. Clear as mud.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

With GrapheneOS you can enable the setting that requires you to use biometric identification to get to the passcode screen, which means you're always protected by both.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 2 points 4 days ago

Another day closer to Chiron.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

well they have the "border search exception" so at the border, no, they generally do not need a warrant for "routine searches" of electronic devices. Fucked up, but that is the law on the books and US courts have virtually always upheld it when it comes up.

[–] cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A judge issues a warrant when there is an active criminal investigation. If there's no investigation, no warrant.

[–] cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh, that's not how it works in the united States. Is this some commonwealth legal thing?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It is how it works inside the united states. It's just they claim that because he was on the flight side of the airport, he wasn't inside the US.

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Assuming we lived in a rational world with a fair and impartial justice system

That's like assuming unicorns will protect all that is good and sugar is effective weight loss

[–] soratoyuki@piefed.zip 4 points 4 days ago

Well yeah. Hence the second half of that sentence.