this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
96 points (84.3% liked)

Selfhosted

61003 readers
296 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
96
[AIT] The Codeberg ban on LLM content (aussie.zone)
submitted 4 days ago by SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
143 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Right - I see the other topic has been locked / author hasn't returned to follow community rules.

Here's the original topic https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49003386

and a measured (IMHO) response to it. (BTW, do your self a favour and change tabs with that site open :)

https://xn--gckvb8fzb.com/i-regret-migrating-to-codeberg/

It's a tough spot, Codeberg has found themselves in and I wish them luck. But beyond that, this is (yet) another reminder that in 2026, if you don't self host it, the cloud is just someone else computer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FishFace@piefed.social -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think your feelings are irrelevant to the admins' and don't change the fact that they aren't being honest (with people, or quite possibly themselves)

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are honest and say what they are doing, go make your own free git hub with crypto and LLM?

[–] FishFace@piefed.social -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It must be so nice that you can dismiss reasoned argument about why I don't believe they're being honest with a plain assertion.

go make your own free git hub with crypto and LLM?

Why? It doesn't interest me. Nothing that I've said suggests I would be.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, one of those entitled people.

No I'm not discussing your "reasonings" about a "plain assertion", because:

A) they do what they want with their thing, it's not for you to decide anything.

B) you just come down as a twat.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A) I haven't tried to decide anything. I've commented on their public statement, with reasons.

B) since you don't seem to have understood what I'm saying (see above, and previous comment) you've not given me any reason to care about your assessment of me.

You're not interested in discussing my comment... just stop replying instead of calling me names?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or even better:

Blocked