this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
234 points (100.0% liked)

World News

57265 readers
2716 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sunk cost fallacy. Russia's blunders will be one for the history books and will be in lectures of geopolitical and military academies for a long long time.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's more a classic lesson in authoritarianism. Yeah, they can do things that are hard to do in a democracy, but they can also drag down the country with them and you can't vote them out.

[–] KittyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the war was started as a way to get the military away from him because they were plotting.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

Was he not popular amongst the military before the war? Why would they have been plotting against him?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sunk cost fallacy.

Not quite. If Putin surrenders now he'll be falling out of a window, so this is more or less rational self-preservation on the part of the people actually making these decisions.

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

There were several ready offramps at certain stages throughout. Now that you're broke and starting to lose ground it's harder to declare victory and erect a statue.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Surrender? I like the way you think but I'd settle for an end of war. Either way, for what he has done to Russia, I think he's on his way out a window either way. The public would be greatful for a change in leadership. Putin opened his own window.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

I like the way you think but I'd settle for an end of war.

Even if it wasn't a surrender, it'd definitely be spun as such by his political rivals. He needs to save face somehow and the only way to do that is new territory that Ukraine isn't going to let him have.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's not really sunk cost fallacy. It's just doing what keeps him alive at this point.