this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
606 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

86682 readers
3183 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In an online discussion post, Alcorn State University history professor Dr. Jason Gibson posed a question that represented part of his students' midterm. It was about the...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 45 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What a waste of money. Why go to school if you’re just going to use AI? What are you paying for?

[–] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

University degrees serve at least two functions.

One function is a sort of guarantee that you have the knowledge and skills of the particular degrees you obtain.

The other function is to show that you are the kind of person who gets university degrees... whether that is because you are competent or just that you come from a socio-economic background that values university degrees nad can afford them.

For that second function cheating matters very little if you don't get caught.

For the first function, it might also not be super relevant. I had to take a humanities class for my computer science degree. If I had cheated on the theater exam it would not have made me a worse programmer. 😄

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

To your last paragraph: Yes and no. It's not only the material that is taught, but also the approaches that you learn while dealing with it.

If you cheated on the theater exam, and masterfully didn't get caught. On paper: great. In reality: social settings might be harder to deal with, because you would approach them in the same way. Just it's not visible on paper.

If you didnt cheat and flunked: You're a programmer who can stamp out code, and most likely unable to deal with anything else at work that is more theatrical than cold hard logic and math.

I always saw education (and most intelligent people do corroborate as well) as a training ground, not entirely for the substance taught, but to show that you can deal with it (your function 2, but more in the sense, given such problems, you will know how to approach them, and where to look for knowledge, because nobody remembers everything).

[–] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago

Ah I had a different perspective in school. I had the guidance counselors sell me on how useful each class would be before I gave them my hard earned money. It’s expensive so I only wanted to buy valuable lessons.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 17 hours ago

A piece of paper you can get in front of your parents, then wipe your ass with.

[–] Yttra@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The piece of paper that companies keep demanding you have, despite their AI black box always filtering you out for hyper specific and arbitrary reasons?

The real answer is they're probably just lazy, but I wouldn't blame anyone who doesn't really value the work that goes into their degrees and diplomas anymore (not that I'm against post-secondary education, though)

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Why go to school if you’re just going to use AI? What are you paying for?

You could also ask what good is a school that only teaches you things that can be reliably answered by AI.

Or, if you prefer, why is the school curriculum defining and evaluating progress in a way that can be passed by an AI.

IMHO it shows that certain subjects rely way too much on rote memorization and loose cognitive associations and should maybe take this moment to rethink their approach.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 29 minutes ago

Literally all knowledge and understanding requires memorization of some sort and the understanding of reality and prior information.

It is difficult to fathom the level of wrong in this comment.

Here's the thing people who lack knowledge, critical thinking and understanding about the how the world works. Still form opinions and makes decisions as if they did have that knowledge and understanding. Which negatively affects everyone else.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 20 hours ago

Getting practice at ctrl-C, ctrl-V?