this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
72 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43299 readers
225 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 27 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

After this was pointed out, prosecutors took another look. They agreed that Klayme’s appeal should be allowed. Had the case been properly investigated, the court says now, evidence “would have identified an individual whose first name is Jay whose IP address appears to be in California.”

Apparently the prosecutor has no responsibility to ensure that evidence is real before arguing it in court?

Hopefully this guy at least gets some serious cash for this fuck up.

[–] A_be_seedy@beehaw.org 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

He'll probably get a couple bucks per day he was in jail.

[–] DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 points 7 hours ago

Is that a thing in Canada?