this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
993 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

86745 readers
2439 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I don't think that's how you'd use it.

You'd see some weirdo in wayfarers and load up the app to check. Simple.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net -1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't even trust the "only give permission to use [camera/mic/bluetooth/location] while the app is active" setting.

I would not enter a public space with my phone lit up like a EM Christmas tree, sonar pinging every receiver in sight.

Let alone giving some rando app the access to every piece of NFC/radio comms on the off chance it can positively identify someone's spy glasses, because that means if they are, ive just given their spy glasses my phone's identifiers, and I'm spending more time near them and more time to possibly end up on some shady company's panopticon server.

It's like the people suggesting shining a laser into a flock camera, it might destroy a bit of the sensor, but they've also put a highly visible beam of light directly from themselves to it.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't think the app does that, it's scanning for pings, not sending out pings. Listening for signals from Meta glasses.... it's not listening to connect with anything, it's just passively listening. Also it only uses blue tooth... I don't know what you're going on about with radio and internet signals.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So you have to leave bluetooth on, which means your device is broadcasting an active bluetooth signal.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/14/opinion/bluetooth-wireless-tracking-privacy.html

If any random shop can use any phone's active bluetooth to track and profile every user that's i side or nearby, I don't want to have bluetooth active when in public. Genuinely not worth it just to fi d some glasshole pervert when my own eyes can do the job without giving away any more of my data. That's what I'm on about.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 58 minutes ago (1 children)

So you have to leave Bluetooth on

No, you can spot a weirdo turn blue tooth on and confirm it, then turn it off.

Look, I don't think this app is for someone like you.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 points 52 minutes ago

Oh I know it isn't, because I trust google as far as I can throw a datacenter.

But I'm still struggling to see the use of an app that makes you stop and go "let me ask my app to turn on my remote connection feature and search to see if this person is wearing the pervert glasses." instead of using my eyes and going "That guy looks like he's wearing pervert glasses, I'm leaving the area."