23

EU leaders have an opportunity to stop treating repression as a side issue and instead make human rights more central to their engagement with China.

...

*Opinion piece by Hélène de Rengervé, a senior advocate on corporate accountability at Human Rights Watch; and Maya Wang, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. *

...

The truth is that China’s economy and industry are intertwined with the Chinese government’s human rights abuses. State-imposed forced labor, forced labor transfers of Uyghur workers, the prohibition on independent unions, forced land seizures or coerced relocations have all featured in industries key to China’s relationship with Europe, from electric battery production, to solar and renewable energy supply chains, to technology.

...

Meanwhile, vague criminal offenses, mass surveillance, and pervasive repression allow Chinese authorities not only to silence critics, but also to reshape communities and entire industries with little resistance.

European governments have, in effect, turned a blind eye to these human rights violations as some of Europe’s most important industries sought access to Chinese markets and Chinese suppliers. These include strategic sectors such as automotive or critical raw materials needed for electronic products and batteries.

...

The Chinese government’s human rights abuses should not be isolated from Europe’s interests. EU leaders have an opportunity to stop treating repression as a side issue and instead make human rights more central to their engagement with China. They should work jointly to harmonize their policies, so that together, they can resist the Chinese government’s retaliation and foster a more human-rights aligned trade ecosystem.

...

Archived

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 2 months ago

@balsoft@lemmy.ml

China severely limited double-use exports back in 2023/2024.

This is false.

Here is a brief list of sanctions involving Israel. As you will see, all the sanctions imposed are by the EU, European countries, the U.S., U.K., Australia, Japan, and other democratically governed states. None from China.

This is .. (in fact, it is better) compared to Europe-backed IMF investments, which force countries into capitalism and austerity in ways that Chinese “no-strings-attached” investment just can’t.

This is false, too.

China's loans come with a lot of "strings attached" if you want to put it that way. Amongst others, one report, How China Collaterizes: New Report Reveals Hidden Structures in Global Lending (pdf), sheds light on the secured lending practices of Chinese creditors in low- and middle-income countries and shows how Chinese creditors secure priority access to cash flows and liquid assets far beyond the IMF or World Bank has ever done, as the report says,

In a typical transaction, debtors [from low and middle-income countries] promise to route their principal commodity export revenues through overseas bank accounts [at banks in mainland China] that remain out of public sight and largely beyond their control until the debts are repaid. The cash balances in these accounts, mostly located in China and controlled by the lenders, can be very large; in low-income, commodity-exporting countries, they average more than 20% of annual public debt service to all external creditors ...

Almost half of China’s ... lending portfolio, or nearly $420 billion across 57 countries, is effectively collateralized—mostly with deposits in bank accounts abroad ... As security, Chinese lenders strongly prefer liquid assets—in particular, cash deposits in bank accounts located in China. They also want visibility and control over revenue streams ...

Collateral is often unrelated to the stated purpose of the loan ... Instead of relying on infrastructure project assets and future revenues, which may never materialize, [Chinese lenders] seek access to established export proceeds. Exporters commit to route these proceeds through offshore bank accounts over the life of the loan, which gives creditors leverage in the relationship as well as a source of repayment.” The report notes that the World Bank and the IMF have recently raised concerns about “collateralization involving unrelated assets or revenues” and warned that it is “likely to create problems" ...

In another report, China as an International Lender of Last Resort (pdf), China’s rescue loans differ from those of established international lenders of last resort in that they

  • (i) are opaque
  • (ii) carry relatively high interest rates [ the typical rescue loan by Chinese banks requires interest rates of 5 percent, considerably higher than the comparable average IMF interest rate of around 2 percent], and
  • (iii) are almost exclusively targeted to debtors of China's Belt and Road Initiative.

As the researchers conclude amongst others,

We see historical parallels to the era when the US started its rise as a global financial power, especially in the 1930s and after World War 2, when it used the US Ex-Im Bank, the US Exchange Stabilization Fund and the Fed to provide rescue funds to countries with large liabilities to US banks and exporters ... Over time, these ad hoc activities by the US developed into a tested system of global crisis management, a path that China may possibly pursue as well.

[-] balsoft@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

China’s loans come with a lot of “strings attached” if you want to put it that way. Amongst others, one report, How China Collaterizes: New Report Reveals Hidden Structures in Global Lending (pdf), sheds light on the secured lending practices of Chinese creditors in low- and middle-income countries and shows how Chinese creditors secure priority access to cash flows and liquid assets far beyond the IMF or World Bank has ever done, as the report says,

China's investments/loans are just that, loans, an imperfect thing to do in a capitalist world. I would also prefer if those investments were applied differently, but they are very much no-strings-attached compared to IMF loans.

IMF literally mandates that countries adopt extreme austerity measures and destroy their safety nets, so that imperialists have an easier time hyperexploiting the workers there.

China severely limited double-use exports back in 2023/2024.

This is false.

This is true. They don't call it sanctions but they did actually stop selling drone parts for example.

Here is a brief list of sanctions involving Israel. As you will see, all the sanctions imposed are by the EU, European countries, the U.S., U.K., Australia, Japan, and other democratically governed states. None from China.

The sanctions list doesn't mean shit. Look at the weapons used to murder children en masse and ethnically cleanse entire cities in Palestine. All of them come from those "democratically governed states", a lot of them for free.

Look at the diplomatic and propaganda cover they are running for Israel. What Merz is saying about "Netanyahu doing the dirty work for us". What happens to anti-genocide protesters in Germany. How the western media tried to hide the genocide being livestreamed on TikTok for two years.

[-] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 2 months ago

Chinese loans come at much worse conditions compared to IMF loans. This is clear by many independent investigation. I provided two of them.

You cant't provide any proof for you claims as they are wrong. China and Israel are close allies, the ties have been becoming stronger in recent years.

[-] balsoft@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Chinese loans come at much worse conditions compared to IMF loans

They are at "worse conditions" in the sense of percentages and collateral requirements compared to IMF loans, however they do not force the debtor country to adopt economic and political changes suicidal to them in the long term.

This is clear by many independent investigation

"Independent investigation"

Looks inside

Capitalist propaganda

China and Israel are close allies, the ties have been becoming stronger in recent years.

Compared to Germany, France or Italy for example? That's an insane claim to make. China just trades with everyone, Israel included, they are not an ally in any meaningful sense.

[-] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 2 months ago

They are at “worse conditions” in the sense of percentages and collateral requirements compared to IMF loans, however they do not force the target country to adopt economic and political changes suicidal to them in the long term.

Read the reports, or at least the summaries. Chinese loans come with a lot (more) string attached than anything from the West.

You are never providing any source for what you say. You are just parroting pro-China talking points likely learned in the ml comms. This is complete waste of time.

[-] balsoft@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Chinese loans come with a lot (more) string attached than anything from the West.

Really? Which Chinese loans force countries to adopt strict austerity measures including gutting universal healthcare? The "strings attached" to Chinese loans are mostly (1) have liquid collateral, (2) pay it back, (3) we'll forgive you part of it if you can't. It is still beneficial to China because it boosts their trade partners and therefore their economy indirectly.

"Every time China visits we get a hospital, every time Britain visits we get a lecture."

You are parroting pro-imperialist propaganda without stopping to examine the world around you for a moment.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
23 points (92.6% liked)

Europe

12172 readers
527 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS