this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
98 points (99.0% liked)

Programming

28103 readers
192 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

StatusGator last checked the status of Codeberg on July 31, 2026 at 7:57 PM CEST and the service was operational. There have been 83 user-submitted reports of outages in the past 24 hours, but the outage is now resolved.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Still better uptime than Github

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not sure it actually is. At best it is too early to tell.

[–] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you sure about that?

Github's "highscore" for consecutive days without incidents this year is 6.

https://www.dayswithoutgithubincident.com/

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes but that tracks issues of all severities and with all of GitHub's services of which there are a great many. Also "days since incident" is a terrible metric because it doesn't capture how long the incidents last.

For example the latest incident is that copilot had degraded performance with Fable due to an Anthropic issue. It only last 18 minutes, only affected part of a part of their service, and it wasn't even their fault!

That's very different to "all of GitHub is down for 7 hours".

So yes. I am not sure GitHub is worse.

[–] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago

Yes but that tracks issues of all severities and with all of GitHub’s services of which there are a great many.

Yes. Remember there are two different main types of github users.

  1. Devs who just use github as a repo host, and maybe as an issue tracker
  2. Devs who use github for everything. Repo hosting, issue tracking, CI/CD pipelines, linting, testing, deployments, code editing, auth providing, and LLM slop generation.

Users in the first group won't notice anything going wrong until only the services they use are affected.

Also “days since incident” is a terrible metric because it doesn’t capture how long the incidents last.

Users in the second group experience full blown "intelligence brownouts" when any service goes down because they're coupled so strongly together. That's why that metric is useful (and also because it shows the true "number of nines" used in SLAs).

And, github is doing every insidious trick they know to push group 1 users into becoming group 2 users.

So yes. I am not sure GitHub is worse.

If github weren't trying to force users into the second group, then I think we could give them some more leeway here. But they're not, so yes github is much much worse.


[...] For example the latest incident is that copilot had degraded performance with Fable due to an Anthropic issue. It only last 18 minutes, only affected part of a part of their service, and it wasn’t even their fault!

That’s very different to “all of GitHub is down for 7 hours”.

If you want something a bit more granular, then you can check: https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/