this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
747 points (98.7% liked)

Funny

15922 readers
846 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Nah. I haven't seen a convincing argument that gen AI is going to coalesce from this shit show.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

never said it would. I'm asserting that by the time AI gets to the point where its as useful as humans, it'll inherently be as deserving of autonomy and freedom as we are. which brings you back to being required to pay a living wage.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 4 points 1 week ago (19 children)

My point is, I don't believe the current AI tech is going to get to the point where it's as useful as humans.

We have long since reached the point where diminishing returns make significant improvements or advancement unfeasible.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago

yes, we're talking about different things.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

"AI" is going to coalesce into a single mass before it implodes.

[–] TheLegendaryAssholeOfJushinLiger@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AGI you mean? IDK It's arguably here. They're senile, though. Working with a senile genius is the best way I can put it, I think. Is it "people?" IDK fuck if I know. How could we ever really know?

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (7 children)

IDK It's arguably here.

That "IDK" is doing some heavy lifting.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 5 points 1 week ago (28 children)

It’s arguably here.

LOL. That's quite a bold assertion.

load more comments (28 replies)