54
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] azdle@news.idlestate.org 17 points 3 weeks ago

refusing to follow semantic versioning standards that are designed to essentially account for that is pants-on-head stupid.

Seems like it would be a bit hard to follow a versioning scheme that it predates by almost 20 years. Lua 5.2 even predates semver 1.0.0.

Before semver there was basically no standardization in versioning schemes and the meaning that semver applied to version numbers basically didn't exist (at least in my experience) before it came around. Everyone just kinda had their own meaning for what version numbers meant.

[-] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 weeks ago

semantic versioning wasn't a new concept when semver 1.0.0 was released. Before that lot of projects already followed this scheme and this was just made official so that everyone should follow it as the standard. So its kind of like if all web browsers support non standard features, and then the committee decides to add it to the standard to make it official. My point is, that the release of semver 1.0.0 isn't the invention of it.

Ok that’s actually an excellent point that I hadn’t accounted for lol

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
54 points (95.0% liked)

Programming

28274 readers
342 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS