this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
248 points (89.5% liked)

Fuck AI

7978 readers
1926 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why go for the cures right?
Paywalled source https://ft.trib.al/Uk6VCRG

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

I'm guessing it created it the same way i created a giant eight limbed creature called an Octophant, using a piece of paper and a pencil.

It does not make it exist.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

According to this non-paywalled article, it created thousands of potential genomes from which the scientists running the experiment chose three hundred promising candidates. They then had bacteria make those and used them for their bacteriophagy experiment. So essentially the AI made the blueprints that the scientists then turned into real stuff.

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Let's get real here. Could the bacteria make my Octophant if I clean up the pencil lines?!

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago

Cat girls first dangit! Get in line.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately the science hasn't gotten that far yet, but maybe in the future.

[–] barnacul@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

So the AI's role in all this, given that creating new viruses in a lab is already understood and well-practiced, was just to generate a list of virus configuration options (presumably working from existing examples), from which scientists had to discard ~90% of what the AI generated before moving on to the next step.

Sounds like an attempt at a headline more than a genuine scientific effort.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago

So the AI's role in this process, which is already known and well-practiced,

Uh... no? Creating custom-made genomes for curing specific diseases isn't "known and well-practiced;" it's an area of active research.

from which scientists had to discard ~90% of what the AI generated before moving on to the next step.

That's basically in line with how AI is used in similar applications; even if most of what you get is busts AI can make so much stuff that it can compete with (or even outdo) other alternatives by sheer quantity. Sure someone has to filter out the useful stuff from the trash, but the very fact that it produces useful stuff makes it worth it. This method is well-established in other areas, so there's no reason to dismiss it here.

Scientists had no clue at all how to design bacteriophages is my understanding. Only with the help of LLM have they been able to generate the first man-made bacteriophages ever.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Same question to you, why would you do this?

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Consider the military and industrial applications of the octophant.

[–] LemmyBruceLeeMarvin@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

[You Have Been Reported to the Raytheon Ethics Board]

[–] LemmyBruceLeeMarvin@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

[All Clear. Proceed]

[Congratulations on your Sydney gottlieb ethics in STEM award! The bonus should show up in your account by Monday!]

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Oh boy a promotion!

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Same answer: The hubris of man.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Same way we all created the sun, and built a house next to it as children. All without picking up a hammer. Lazy kids.

A version of this came out of a DND campaign. They're called octen. Like oxen, but octen. They're like regular oxen, except they have eight legs. The legs have the same fur and color as cattle legs, but then bend up and move like a tarantula's.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes and no. Going from a design to production takes remarkably little time these days.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you just scan his picture of an octophant and print it out and it exists? I'd bet you have a bunch of meat and no life. That said, please spend the time and effort into something more productive instead of a octophant was the point

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That said, please spend the time and effort into something more productive

Like curing antibiotic-resistant bacterial diseases? Because that's what the experiment was for.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

An octophant is a bacterial disease? Lol

And yes this experiment may be an absolutely stupid thing to do. Could it work out in a extremely well regulated extremely tight secure facility, sure.

Is that happening, not in the U.S., we are cutting all the regulations and health precautions, so if what they create ever kills good bacteria as well during the tests, you should assume it will be spreading to the population.

Why wasn't it contained? Our research grants were cut in half so we skipped on the precautions. Also the regulatory board no longer exists, and our OSHA equivalent hasn't stopped by in over 2 years. I think they may have shut down

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Mine was called Strandaglend and added tempera to the medium. Sometimes I forget the middle name of relatives but never of my creation 42 years ago.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes and no. Going from a design to production takes remarkably little time these days.

Are there commercial virus-printing services? If so, what keeps some yahoo from sending them the virus-equivalent of a .stl file for smallpox? Can someone just order virulent pathogens printed on command?

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Assuming that it will work from the first try

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, it's a known process.

There's a YouTube channel called Thought Emporium.

The guy used to do live streams were he designed custom DNA, and then ordered it from a lab that could produce it.

It was a simple commercial transaction.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago

I used to work in a wet lab. Agree, designing or multiplying DNA is not a problem. The problem is to make it stable and do what you intend it to do. This could be done only by allowing ai to control the whole process with minimal human interaction