this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
153 points (99.4% liked)

PC Gaming

15282 readers
698 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The article has the answers you seek.

The thing being sold by the pirates was a free demo of the game that they didn't have the infrastructure to properly distribute in some places. Letting the pirates sell it drummed up interest for the full game that they were selling.

There were probably plenty of other ways they could have done this without letting people be scammed but this was likely just the easiest.

[โ€“] sqw@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

the line between "legit" and "scammer" is pretty blurry assuming they were really just copying the free-to-copy shareware and selling the floppies.