Late Stage Capitalism
A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.
A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.
RULES:
1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.
2 No Trolling
3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, anti-communism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.
4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.
5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.
6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.
Introduction to Socialism (external links)
Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Basic Course
Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course
view the rest of the comments
quoting wiki:
For me the result is among others anarchism (absence of state/money). Anarchism itself is probably not communism per se, but I consider it a part of "full communism".
I really would like that to be true, but I don't see how... As I said, we never had anything close to it, whereas we had/have something very close to pure capitalism (looking at you USA...), fairly stable (not a good thing, IMO, as we see especially currently with climate-change and growing inequality). Also for China: autocratic State-capitalism (mostly at least), probably better than whatever USA currently is, but still capitalism, and definitely not communism.
What I meant with "doesn’t fit in human nature" is basically described in https://lemmy.world/post/50376887/25196710 So yes for small-scale, very likely no at (especially) a global scale... The egoism and hunger of power of a few manipulative individuals will likely always prevent this unfortunately, also the "fear" of foreign stuff (like people/migrants), and the difference of global (natural) wealth, like fertile soil etc. I think having social contact with most people within such a society is almost a requirement (i.e. trusting individuals of the society), which is why I don't see how we can achieve something like that globally, distrust and (often irrational) fear is probably the deal-breaker per se for that.
What Marxists consider to be the state and what anarchists consider to be the state are different, because both have different analysis of class. For anarchists, all hierarchy is inherently a class based distinction, but this isn't the case for Marxists, ergo stateless society in Marxism has administration and vertical organization.
China is socialist. The commanding heights of the economy are overwhelmingly publicly owned, and the working classes control the state. It isn't a fully collectivized society yet, but it's on the road towards it.
Ultimately, you are applying criticisms more applicable to anarchism to Marxism, which isn't really a developed reasoning against communism.