this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
34 points (100.0% liked)

WomensStuff

1350 readers
351 users here now

Women only trans inclusive This is an inclusive community for all things women. Whether you're here for make up tips, feminism or just friendly chit chat, we've got you covered.

Rules…

  1. Women only… trans women are women, and transphobic or gender critical talk isn’t allowed. Anyone under the trans umbrella (e.g. non-binary, bigender, agender) is free to decide whether a women's community is a good fit for them.
  2. Don’t be a dick. No personal attacks, no aggression, play nice.
  3. Don’t hate on groups, hatefilled talk about groups is not allowed. Ever.
  4. No governmental politics, so no talk of Trump actions etc. We recommend Feminism@beehaw.org for that, but here is an escape from it.
  5. New accounts or users with few comments may have their posts removed to prevent spam and bad-faith participation.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
LadyButterfly@lemmy.world
CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al
foxglove@lazysoci.al
LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone
foxglove@piefed.blahaj.zone
34
What do you think of AI? (piefed.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 week ago by LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/womensstuff@piefed.blahaj.zone
59 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

So many people 1) think of AI as their unpaid "personal assistant" and at the same time 2) think of AI chatbots as being women. I really hope AI doesn't accidentally re-normalize the master/servant dynamic, and it may not, but it's something to watch out for in the coming years.

I work in a field (technical editing) that may be replaced by ~~AI~~ bosses overvaluing AI, but at the moment, my job is more necessary than ever because all my writers now insist on sending me slop instead of actually doing their jobs.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I have the AI voice set to male, so I think of men as my unpaid assistant. 😉

[–] weps@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

source?

[–] MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Here you go!

  1. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00779-024-01830-8#Sec12

2.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349711573_The_most_human_bot_Female_gendering_increases_humanness_perceptions_of_bots_and_acceptance_of_AI

3.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385046331_He_or_she_Impact_of_gender's_well-being_chatbots_on_user_perceptions_and_intentions_a_study_of_agency_communality_and_trust

  1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337403025_Gender_Bias_in_Chatbot_Design

  2. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-ai-bots-and-voice-assistants-reinforce-gender-bias/

  3. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-19212-2#Sec19

  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882126000757#sec4

  5. https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/21003

9.https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1757581825000131#sec002.4.7

  1. https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/crsj/vol30/iss2/4/

  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25002239

  3. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10778012251397966

  4. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/dcc80056-89bb-48ae-b45f-975d4aea957f/content

  5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-026-01049-8

[–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well done on the resources! Do you have access to academic journals?

[–] MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Sadly, no. I tried to pull sources that had full text, but there were a few where that was not the case.

One of the things I miss most from college was free and universal access to this stuff.

[–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 3 points 6 days ago

Yeah canbe tricky!