this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
552 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

87214 readers
4219 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Funwayguy@lemmy.world 81 points 4 days ago (6 children)

This approach only works in daylight with cameras that rely on colour only. Infrared spectrum cameras such as what Australia uses on mobile phone traffic cameras are much harder to deal with. Patterns don't cut it and it's a huge part of military research into hiding vehicles from infrared spotters.

Disabling the cameras entirely is much more effective.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

DO BOTH

(defense in depth)

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Can’t you make patterns in infrared reflective paint?

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Here comes the sun, do do do do

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

No need, you can just use an IR spotlight to blind the camera. Unlike the military you're not trying to hide the vehicle.

But either way you're actively trying to avoid being picked up by speed cameras so you get a fine.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This isn't about speed cameras, it's about "safety" surveillance cameras. No laws have to be broken. Evading Flock isn't illegal

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Not really. We don't have materials that absorb or reflect infrared light. It's one of the reasons it's hard to beat inferred-guided (heat seeking) missiles, the only real solution is to drop something hotter than your plane, aka a flare.

So... get ready for a new era of commercial automotive flares I guess?

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You are mixing different types of IR and on top are wrong for both cases too. We have materials for both NIR and thermal IR that absorb or reflect them.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've been wrong before, this wouldn't be the first time. But what part of it was wrong? Genuinely, can you clear it up?

As far as absorbing IR light, I'm not even sure how that would work, wouldn't it just be emitted again as heat?

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So if we focus on thermal IR: shiny metal surfaces hardly emit or absorb it. A black surface emits and absorbs as much as possible. We quantify this via the emissivity (and also reflectivity, shiny metal is a mirror). Emissivity of 1 = theoretical maximum of a prefect absorber/emitter (both are directly linked), everyday stuff like skin or wood is about 0.95, shiny metal surfaces roughly 0.1, a rusty or painted surface again about 0.95.

You only emit and absorb the same in thermal equilibrium. If the surface is hotter, it emits more. If it is colder, it absorbs more.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So with that last part, I get that in theory, but practically, you can only really absorb IR temporarily, right? Because it all gets released again as heat eventually. Like, say you have a mostly inert object, that isn't creating any meaningful amount of heat. If you hit that object with 10 joules of thermal IR, over time, wouldn't nearly all of that energy be either reflected or emitted off it as IR radiation?

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That is how heat works in general, but that has nothing directly to do with reflecting or absorbing IR.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I guess it depends on the context, initially I was making comparisons to heat seeking missiles. In that context, one might use the radar absorbent materials to defeat radar guided missiles, but that trick just doesn't work with heat, as you can't "permanently" absorb heat the way you can other kinds of energy. If your vehicle is also generating heat, hiding that is quite difficult.

[–] anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

What if I just hold a sparkler out my window?

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 9 points 4 days ago

For IR you can feasibly run IR dazzle lights all over whatever you want to mask, including your face.

[–] gothic_lemons@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Dumb question I have no idea how infrared light works and cameras. But what if my license plate was just constantly firing infrared light to counter act or "blind" the cameras?

[–] ReignOfTerror@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I wonder if those cameras stop working if you have the new IR blocking window tint that keeps the suns heat out but are otherwise clear. Would the camera just not be able to see inside the car at all?

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Are infrared cameras only detecting the vehicle or are they getting the license plate too?