this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
778 points (98.9% liked)

Work Reform

17190 readers
2480 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

What's crazy is that he's only spending less than 1% of what the tax would cost him.

If he spent $10b and managed to save himself a $13b tax bill, he'd still save $3b.

I suspect he's actually spending much more than $100m. He has probably hired expensive attorneys, expensive accountants, expensive PR firms, etc. We have to hope he hasn't hired private detectives, hackers, hit men, etc.

[–] Lojcs@piefed.social 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Shit like this makes me think the Billionaires are afraid of wealth tax because much of their wealth isn't real. They can materialize 0.05% to fight legislation, but if they tried to liquidate a significant portion of their stocks or whatever that'd decrease the value of the rest of their fortune, not to mention somebody needs to buy what they sold.

They need other people to think what they own is valuable; and they do that by owning it, as rich people are reputable in many people's eyes. If they sell the feedback cycle inverts

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

I'm sure that's part of it. Selling enough stock to meet a 5% wealth tax would sometimes mean that selling those stocks would really drop the value of those shares, and therefore drop their on-paper wealth.

But, the simpler explanation is they don't wanna.