this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
85 points (92.9% liked)

Anarchism

3226 readers
256 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.


Other anarchist comms


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Pro, I think a lot of the anti-nuclear sentiments are leftovers from when nuclear power was not as heavily regulated as it is now.

Now it's basically impossible for a meltdown except for if a literal natural disaster happens, and sometimes even then

And it's a very clean energy source, with the one problem of what to do with the radioactive waste, but there is far less waste than fossil fuels, and it's easier to get rid of.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm nominally pro, or maybe passively anti while cheaper, more scalable, and cleaner sources are at hand. If you're already going full wind, solar, and geo and there's still a rationale for a nuclear plant, I'm open to it. But that's a big fat if.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The thing with nuclear power is that it's FAR easier to convert a fossil fuel generator to nuclear than it is to convert it to green or to build a new one.

And yes, I agree, we need more green, but we first need to kill off all the fossil fuel options.

[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Although you are right in the sense that nuclear produces steam, I am not aware of any instance of this having been done. The steam turbine is such a small part of a nuclear plant.

In my view nuclear is best as a baseline production and heat production method. The baseline part may reduce as grid batteries smooth out the volatile production of the renewables.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

Coal-to-Nuclear is actually pretty common, LINK

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

As a society, it's easier to do everything at once rather than one thing at a time. Edit: The difference with nuclear is that it's so much more expensive than other green options that spending on it now takes significant potential kwh out of the grid if it is given equal funding priority.