this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
5 points (100.0% liked)
Tacoma
45 readers
2 users here now
Community for the city of Tacoma, WA and surrounding area - events, recommendations, news articles, anything related to Grit City
Rules:
-Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
-No Ads / Spamming.
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It'll be up to the constituents if this impacts their vote, for better or worse.
I'm not keen on arguing that we should allow our representatives to break laws without criticism in order to compete with MAGA. Where's the line?
Fascism is the line. This is the end game.
I do agree that we should apply the law equally and that the constituents will decide. I’m just not going to play the high road while they kill us in the streets anymore.
(Not implying you are)
This argument came up a lot when Graham Platner's credible rape accusations surfaced. I understand the frustration. But I also can't be mad at people who refuse to vote for representatives that conduct themselves in repugnant ways.
Eh I’d say rape or whatever Platber did is orders of magnitude worse than this. This reminds me of when the Dems drummed Frankin (Franken?) out for taking a pic of him hovering his hands over that woman’s boobs.
Don’t get me wrong, I’d love a squeaky clean candidate that never did any wrong or made mistakes. But we’re gonna get rolled if we wait for that person.
I’d be much more interested in someone that makes mistakes, fesses up, makes amends, and works to empower labor instead of capital.
Pretty piss poor timing on her part though.
Absolutely, I agree with you. I can also understand voters that have been negatively impacted by drunk driving to be turned off by this.