this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
-17 points (18.5% liked)

Canada

12244 readers
216 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ProudCanadianCitizen@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Truth in Reporting - the heading should be "Canadians pay more for social benefits (including health and education) and public infrastructure (roads, bridges, sewers, water, hospitals and such) than for food, shelter, and clothing combined' because that is where the bulk of our taxes go. Seen in that light, it looks reasonable.

This may be true for the top 25% income earners, who only have to pay a fraction of their income for food, shelter, and clothing, and the bulk of it goes to investing to grow their wealth. Their taxes should be the main expense of their income.

Definitely not true for the bottom 25%, whose income goes predominantly towards food, shelter, and clothing, with very little left for anything else, and taxes a very small part of their expenditures.

Yet the Fraser Institute only sees the world through the eyes of the entitled rich.