151
Luigi Mangione admits to killing healthcare CEO in stunning court confession
(www.the-independent.com)
A community to post anything related to Luigi Mangione.
Please respect Lemmy.world ToS. Don't plot who should be murdered next in this community.
He should be pardoned and released
I said if I made president he'd be pardoned. I'm not messing. I'm thinking of running, and the more I think, the more I want to fix the system for us little guys. I'll probably "Epstein" myself or fall out of a highrise window, but I'm thinking that's a risk I'll have to take.
If violent terrorists on Jan 6 can be pardoned to then commit more crime, Luigi can be pardoned.
just because? what is your legal philosophy here
Because he killed a monster. Monster hunters are heroes not criminals.
Well I checked the law and there's no exception for monster hunters. It turns out that if you plan and execute a homicide, you're a criminal, even if you kill a monster. WHO KNEW???
The only morally self-consistent way to approach this is as civil disobedience. You gotta take the punishment or you're not an activist, you're just another monster.
What is legal is not always right, and what is right is not always legal - paraphrased from Algernon Sidley, late 1600s.
Full Quote
That which is not just, is not Law; and that which is not Law, ought not to be obeyed.
… the directive power of the law, which is certain, and grounded upon the inherent good and rectitude that is in it, is that alone which has a power over the conscience, whereas the coercive is merely contingent; and the most just powers commanding the most just things, have so often fallen under the violence of the most unjust men, commanding the most execrable villainies, that if they were therefore to be obeyed, the consciences of men must be regulated by the success of a battle or conspiracy, than which nothing can be affirmed more impious and absurd….
If this were so, the governments of the world might be justly called magna latrocinia; and men laying aside all considerations of reason or justice, ought only to follow those who can inflict the greatest punishments, or give the greatest rewards. But since the reception of such opinions would be the extirpation of all that can be called good, we must look for another rule of our obedience, and shall find that to be the law, which being, as I said before, sanctio recta, must be founded upon that eternal principle of reason and truth, from whence the rule of justice which is sacred and pure ought to be deduced, and not from the depraved will of man, which fluctuating according to the different interests, humors and passions that at several times reign in several nations, one day abrogates what had been enacted the other. The sanction therefore that deserves the name of a law, which derives not its excellency from antiquity, or from the dignity of the legislators, but from an intrinsick equity and justice, ought to be made in pursuance of that universal reason to which all nations at all times owe an equal veneration and obedience.
A few examples for you (aside from the blatantly obvious and well known like slavery)
The list goes on and on and on. Many of which are still legal today, or have been reworked for the same effect and are in effect today.
Being "legal" or "illegal" is a distinction without merit.
Slavery was and still is legal, so maybe reconsider what point you're making here.
He's doing civil disobedience by your definition. Literally pleading guilty. In the hypothetical where he receives a pardon, nothing has changed in that regard.
Fuck off nerd
hey 🤓