this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
435 points (96.8% liked)

Piracy: κœ±α΄€Ιͺʟ α΄›Κœα΄‡ ʜΙͺɒʜ κœ±α΄‡α΄€κœ±

70163 readers
466 users here now

βš“ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules β€’ Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

πŸ“œ c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


πŸ’° Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I do not care, even in the slightest about a marketing departments "losses" from issuing CD keys.

Not even in the slightest. Its the cost of doing business.

No other industry, not even the software industry, gets to do this.

Unilever sends me some shit to review? They're not allowed to be upset about the eventual fate of those things.

CD keys are property, and property is tradable.

Just because the original intent is X or Y, doesn't mean dick for shit.

If they didn't like it, maybe they shouldn't issue so many free copies.

At some point they have to take responsibility for the keys they're minting. They can always issue time-limited keys.

There's so many technical solutions to it and so much crying over the resale that I just do not buy the story.