this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
407 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

87214 readers
5959 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 52 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Is there no simple anymore? Plane A went this far on 5 dollars electricity. Plane B went the same distance on X dollars worth of jet fuel. I want to know the distance travelled and I want to know what "X" is.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

$5 for 30 minutes in the air. pick any speed you want. it doesn't matter. avgas and jet fuel don't compete with $5.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 14 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I pick 30 minutes at Mach 7, here's your $5 Canadian and please get out of my way, I do intend to board now.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

I pick 30 minutes at Mach 7

How long do you want to spend at Mach 7 relative to stopping and starting? Because that could be a lot of G-force.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I want people to find my face at the starting runway, and my skull in some field 7 miles away from where the plane landed.

[–] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Meh just accelerate with F-force and then switch to G-force when you are up to speed and vice versa when slowing down, problem solved!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Using N-force, which is the little can of Nox under my seat

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 hours ago

i definitely won't be in your way. bring back pictures.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 16 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Well, the data we do have is that the flight was just under 30 minutes and very likely under 100 miles.

From the Wikipedia on airline fuel efficiency:

The worst-performing flights are short trips of from 500 to 1500 kilometers because the fuel used for takeoff is relatively large compared to the amount expended in the cruise segment, and because less fuel-efficient regional jets are typically used on shorter flights.

In the example values table, the most efficient plane for a 560km trip burns 0.92 kg of fuel per km, so doing some rough math and assuming the electric plane travelled 100 miles, that would be roughly 148kg of fuel, or 50 gallons (190L).

At current jet fuel prices ( $3.76/gallon ) that's about $188 US in jet fuel as a rough estimate. It's unclear if the test flight went up to full altitude or if the plane was at full weight, so a fair comparison might have used even half as much jet fuel.

Edit: From some of the other comments, it seems like they might have only considered flight time as cruising time, not takeoff and landing, so my numbers will be quite far off if that's the case. My gut feeling is that this is probably the case, because this seems like too big a difference otherwise.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

$5 of electricity to lift an airplane 10,000 feet definitely seems low.

If you want to be really smug, you could say a gas powered plane requires $0 of fuel to glide for 30 minutes

[–] Brimstone@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

That’s good enough to get from Britain to Ireland