this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
892 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

87315 readers
3989 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 53 points 3 days ago (5 children)

It would also be in stark defiance of Amazon’s stated climate goals, which center on reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2040.

That’s not lost on the tech giant. But as Amazon spokesperson Margaret Callahan told the NYT, the “world looks different now than when we co-founded the climate pledge.”

What the fuck? They looked at the world recently and said "yeah, climate change isn't as much of a problem as it was before"?!?

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 days ago

No, they looked at the blatant corruption from Fatboy McKiddieFiddlers regime and figured, "eh, what's the point of pretending to give a shit. No fucker has got the balls to stop us from fucking thing up."

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 3 days ago

"current gov allows us to do anything so we don't care anymore because that,'s cheaper"

[–] Mannimarco@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They mean politically, they can get away with this now without blownack, they never gave one single shit about the climate

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The same company that will same day deliver a single tube of toothpaste to my door doesn't care about carbon emissions? What?

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

On one hand that sounds bad, but if that delivery driver is dropping off enough things in one run that would have been individual people driving to a store, does it balance out?

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

Maybe, but Amazon in particular will also bag/box every solitary thing. Not sure if it balances, but it's an interesting question when you put it that way.

Still, I expect they prioritize meeting service levels over fuel economy.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago

Or maybe "eh, it's fucked anyways, let's make red line go up".

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

It's those pesky Canadians again, it's all their fault for mismanaging the fires, not the fact we are cooking ourselves alive.